Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Agway Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990Published

1Dissent

Callahan, J. P. (dissenting).

While I agree that Supreme Court erred in equitably reducing State Insurance Fund’s lien in its entirety, the courts are not limited to a strict mathematical reduction. In my view, some allocation should be made for an equitable apportionment. The determination of what constitutes equitable apportionment of costs has been left to the courts (Matter of Kelly v State Ins. Fund, 60 NY2d 131, 138). In amending Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (1) to provide for allocation of litigation costs between the employee and the carrier, the Legislature purposely adopted the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Martin v. Agway Petroleum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API