Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dime Savings Bank of New York v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1992Published

1Dissent

Eiber, J. (dissenting).

I disagree with my colleagues’ conclusion that the anti-pass-through provision of New York State Tax Law § 253 (1-a) is preempted by regulations promulgated by Federal Home Loan Bank Board (now the Office of Thrift Supervision), and accordingly vote to affirm.

In 1978, the New York State Legislature amended Tax Law § 253 (1-a) to impose an additional mortgage recording tax of 25 cents per $100 of principal debt. Revenues raised by the new tax were earmarked for funding of the New York State Mortgage Guarantee Corporation, which was created for the purpose of insuring…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Morse v. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of WhitmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
  5. Barsh v. Town of UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API