Legal Opinion
Urso v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided January 9, 2008No. Civil 06-cv-346-JMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES R. MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this action brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. (1999) (“ERISA”), plaintiff Wayne Urso (“Urso”) seeks to enforce payment of long-term disability benefits allegedly due under an employee welfare plan insured by defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). Prudential objects, claiming Urso has received all the benefits to which he is entitled. Before the court are both plaintiffs and defendant’s Motions for Judgment on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Navarro Pomares v. Pfizer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Michael F. Terry v. Bayer Corporation and Bayer Corporation Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tebo v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Gammell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Urso v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008