Bonner v. State

I disagree with the majority's conclusions that the appellant preserved his argument for appellate review and that the prosecutor's use of the pantyhose as a visual aid was error. Nevertheless, for reasons set forth herein, I would affirm the appellant's conviction. Therefore, I respectfully concur in the result.

First, the appellant did not preserve his argument for appellate review because he did not timely move for a mistrial. Rather, he waited to make his motion for a mistrial until after the prosecutor, in open court, removed the pantyhose from the package, unrolled the material, and put…