Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pugar v. Greco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1981No. 412Published

1DissentMontgomery, Judge

I most strongly dissent. I do not believe that the Appellees should be permitted to perfect an appeal at this late date from the award of the arbitrators. I believe that it is clear that a party may not avoid the statutory time limits provided for such an appeal by the mere filing of a separate appeal from a clearly interlocutory order.

There are numerous cases holding to the general rule that proceedings subsequent to a final judgment or order do not toll the running of the statutory time within which an appeal must be taken. See In Re Hanna’s Estate, 367 Pa. 337, 80 A.2d 740 (1951), in which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Lima Building Stone Quarry, Inc. v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API