Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Insurance v. Whitaker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1974No. 28974PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Chief Justice.

The restrictions imposed by the provisions of the covenant not to compete ancillary to the employment contract here were larger than necessary for the protection of the employer, and are therefore unreasonable and unenforceable.

Federated Mutual Insurance Company and Federated Life Insurance Company appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Richmond County sustaining a motion to dismiss their complaint in which, as employers, they sought to enforce through injunctive relief restrictive covenants in an employment contract with the appellee, Grady A. Whitaker, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International, Inc. v. KotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  3. Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Dixie Bearings, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Coffee System of Atlanta v. FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Koger Properties, Inc. v. Adams-Cates CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. McNease v. National Motor Club of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API