Legal Opinion

Orlett v. Suburban Propane

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1989No. CA89-05-028PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoehler, J.

This cause is before the court on appeal from a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of defendants-appellees, Suburban Propane, Suburban Propane Gas Corporation, and Texgas Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Texgas”).

The facts indicate that on March 31, 1986, plaintiffs-appellants, Daniel J. Orlett and Bonnie Orlett, entered into a “liquid propane gas purchase agreement and equipment lease,” whereby Texgas agreed to lease three three-hundred-pound gas tanks together with “all the LP gas to be stored and used in the above equipment.” Originally, an automatic-fill service method…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. County Asphalt, Inc. v. Lewis Welding & Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Baker Protective Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Evans v. Graham Ford, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Motorists Mutual Ins. v. JonesLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Featherstone v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Jones Distributing Co. v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Eva v. Midwest National Mortgage Banc, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API