Legal Opinion
Furman v. Cirrito
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 24, 1986No. Docket 84-7113PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
A motion addressed to this panel requires us to address the subject of costs. Appellants’ complaint was dismissed in district court. On appeal, we affirmed and costs were taxed against appellants. Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court. It reversed, reinstated the complaint, and awarded costs in that Court to appellants. *354Appellants have now moved for vacation of our previous order taxing costs against them and for the awarding of costs in their favor. The motion is granted as described below.
I
By order entered January 10, 1984 the United States District Court for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Larchmont Engineering, Inc. v. Toggenburg Ski Center, Inc., Larchmont Engineering, Inc. v. Greek Peak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Nita B. Smith, Debtor. Nita B. Smith, Cross-Appellant v. First America Bank, N.A., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Smart v. Local 702 International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Furman v. CirritoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- International Cablevision, Inc. v. NoelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.