Legal Opinion

Odom v. City of Minden

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 3, 1972No. 52104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In re: Troy S. Odom applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs denied. Applicant’s remedy is by appeal. See Bowen v. Doyal, 259 La. 839, 253 So.2d 200. Under the circumstances of this case and since the applicant relied on our prior jurisprudence, he is allowed 15 days to perfect appeal to the appropriate Court of Appeal.

McCALEB, C. J., is of the opinion that, since the time for appealing has elapsed, this Court is without authority to extend the time as provided by law.

He is also of the view that Bowen v. Doyal should be overruled insofar as it overrules prior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowen v. DoyalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Odom v. City of MindenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Odom v. City of MindenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API