Rafalko v. Georgiadis
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Dissent · MimsJustice Mims
I disagree with the majority's conclusion that no assignment of error challenges the circuit court's ruling that the no-contest clause applied only to the changes made in the September 2012 amendment. To the contrary, I believe the trustee presents that challenge in her third assignment of error. I also disagree with the majority's conclusion that the evidence supports the circuit court's judgment that the trustee's decision to disqualify Paul and Basil Georgiadis ("the sons") for violating the no-contest clause was improper. Accordingly, I disagree with the majority's decision to affirm the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Kelsey.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Williams v. Dominion Technology Partners, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Perry v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Potts v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.