Torrance v. State

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant Larry A. Torrance appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for new trial. In a single point on appeal, Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for new trial because Appellant did not have the opportunity to lodge objections to the presentence investigation report (PSI) at his sentencing hearing. We affirm.

On May 9, 2000, Appellant pled guilty to the offense of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver. The trial court deferred any finding of guilt until a PSI was filed. On July 14, 2000,…