Legal Opinion

Joy v. Allen

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 15, 1846No. Case No. 7,552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Circuit Justice.

The right of seamen to wages, as a general principle, after freight has been earned and the voyage ended, and to recover the same of the owners, or the master when their agent, or of the vessel in rem when not lost, is well defined and clearly regulated by many adjudged cases, as well as by elementary principles. But the rules on this subject, in the case of whaling voyages, where usually the wages are not a fixed sum per month, or a quantum meruit, but a portion or share in the earnings, and controlled by specific provisions in the shipping articles, are less…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Orange County Bank v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Allen v. SewallNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Rice v. AustinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  4. President of the Portland Bank v. StubbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  5. Elliott v. RossellNew York Supreme Court · 1813

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API