Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Foster

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 25, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Defendants’ petition for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

The plaintiff was in the employ of the Providence Warehouse Co., of which the defendant, Samuel J. Foster, was the agent, and his son, the other defendant, an employee. A sum of fifty dollars belonging to the corporation had been lost, for which the plaintiff, a bookkeeper, was held responsible, and the amount was deducted from his pay. On January 20, 1888, Mr. Foster handed the plaintiff some money to pay the help. The plaintiff, acting under the advice of counsel, took from this money the amount due him at the time, including what had been deducted from his pay, put it into his pocket, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bliss v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Hodgeden v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  3. Johnson v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  4. Baldwin v. HaydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. NorrisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Stanley v. PayneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
  5. Souther v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API