Legal Opinion

Chrysalis House, Inc. v. Tackett

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2009No. 2008-SC-000221-WCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ordered the claimant’s employer to pay him a double income benefit under KRS 342.730(l)(c)2, basing the decision on findings that he returned to work at the same or a greater wage but that the employer terminated the employment and he earned less presently than at the time of his injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board and the Court of Appeals affirmed based on the statute’s unambiguous language. Appealing, the employer asserts that it discharged the claimant for cause due to an allegation of criminal activity; that the ALJ determined he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Revenue Cabinet v. O'DANIELKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fawbush v. GwinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Louisville v. HelmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  4. Hale v. CombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Stephens v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Livingood v. Transfreight, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Falk v. Alliance Coal, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Active Care Chiropractic, Inc. v. RuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. John Fuertes v. Ford Motor Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Joseph Jewell v. Ford Motor CompanyKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API