Legal Opinion

Wood v. Wood

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1933No. Appeal, 171PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

June 30, 1933:

For many years Walter Wood, who is appellant, and his brother Stuart Wood, who died March 2, 1914, were partners. Their business was to act as “financial and selling agents for the Camden Iron Works and the Florence Iron Works......[corporations then]......engaged in the manufacture of iron pipe and like material and of machinery.” The firm held shares of stock and bonds of those corporations. It was a partnership at will (Wood v. Todd, 251 Fed. 530) and therefore was dissolved March 2, 1914, by the death of a partner. As survivor, Walter Wood was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Froess v. FroessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Bauer v. Wilkes-Barre Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Freyvogel v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Brenner v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Block v. MylishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Vollet v. PechenikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank v. Warren Lepley Ford, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1958
  4. Globe Sol. v. Nouskhajian, (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Hurley v. HurleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API