Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1953No. 18032PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The act provides that a savings and loan association is not subject to taxation “on its franchise, capital, reserves, surplus, loans, shares, or accounts.” “Franchise” is a term that has various significations. 23 Am. Jur. 715. It has been used in various senses. 37 C.J.S. 141. To properly construe the meaning of the word as here used, it must be considered in connection with the other property for which an exemption from taxation was given. Franchises are property (37 C.J.S. 151), and our law makes provision for the taxation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Griffin v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Macon Railway & Light Co. v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of O'Fallon v. Centurylink, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
  2. Brazosport Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API