Legal Opinion
State v. Barr
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 21, 2004No. 21792-2-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 P.3d 518 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Derrick D. BARR, Appellant.
No. 21792-2-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Five.
September 21, 2004.
Dennis W. Morgan, Attorney at Law, Ritzville, WA, for Appellant.
Gregory Lee Zempel, Douglas Robert Mitchell, Kittitas County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Ellensburg, WA, for Respondent.
KURTZ, J.
Derrick D. Barr was convicted of second degree rape, unlawful imprisonment, and second degree vehicle prowl. On appeal, Mr. Barr contends the trial court erred by admitting a police officer's testimony concerning the Reid…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. WeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. WeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.