Legal Opinion

Pinkney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 1977No. 76-364PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A police officer at the trial of this criminal case, while testifying for the State, said that when he read the defendant his Miranda rights at the scene, “he (the defendant) didn’t make any statements at that time other than he had just bought it (the stolen automobile) for three hundred dollars and that he didn’t have the registration or anything like that to it.” If it were constitutionally possible we would apply the “harmless error” rule to the facts of this case and affirm. However, we feel compelled to reverse upon the authority of Jones v. State, 200 So.2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967);…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Shannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Lucas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Bostic v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tsavaris v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Tindall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API