Legal Opinion
Cox v. Cox
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1998No. 95-FM-420PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Appellant Marian A. Cox filed a motion under Super. Ct. Dom. Rel. R. 60(b) (1997) to amend her divorce decree in order to secure for herself a share of certain pension rights owned by her former husband. She moved separately to enforce and modify the provision of her marital separation agreement relating to child support. The trial court denied both motions, the former on the grounds that it was untimely under Rule 60(b)(1) and that Mrs. Cox had not shown extraordinary circumstances sufficient to warrant relief under Rule 60(b)(6). Regarding the latter, the court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir, Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Clement v. District of Columbia Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cooper v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Clay v. FaisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Partnership Placements, Inc. v. Landmark InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hudson v. ShapiroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tennille v. TennilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lawson v. LawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tennille v. TennilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002