Legal Opinion

Keefe v. City of Monroe

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1929No. 3351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

This is a possessory action, coupled with a demand for damages, brought by the plaintiff against the City of Monroe and the members of the Commission Council. The City and the members of the Council filed exceptions of no cause of action, which were sustained by the Court, and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff alleges in substance that in the spring of 1926, he was employed by the City of Monroe, acting through its Mayor, Arnold Bernstein, its Commissioner of Finance and Utilities, D. A. Breard, and its Commissioner of Streets and Parks, Will Atkinson, to design and superintend the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thayer v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  2. Bowman v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Bruning v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Waller & Edmonds v. CockfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. Boniel v. BlockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Foti v. MonteroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API