Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — Hon. Ralph 8. Laishaio, Judge,

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

Defendant was prosecuted in the criminal court of Jackson county by information of the prosecuting attorney, charging him with unlaw- ■ fully living and cohabiting with Mary 0. Mayers, alias Richter, in a state of open and notorious adultery, they not being married to each other, but defendant being a married man.

It was not charged, nor was it proved, that Mary Mayers was a married woman. Defendant insists that to make out the offense of adultery the woman must be a married woman. To sustain this position his counsel has given the court the benefit of an able argument and an elaborate brief.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Christal v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Hood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State v. HastySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. State v. DeWittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. People v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. VillingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. State v. BaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Hagener v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. State v. HicksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. State v. LeimerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API