Legal Opinion

People v. Koberstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to change venue from Oneida County denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Oneida County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature (see, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Kroemer, 151 AD2d 1049, and cases cited therein). Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DiPiazzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. KroemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API