State v. Medcraft

Defendant was tried upon a complaint charging him with the crime' of practicing dentistry without a license. The trial was had to the court sitting without a jury, and, from a judgment of guilty and a fine imposed pursuant thereto, defendant appeals.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment entered by the trial court, and argues that the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the proceeding dismissed.

Section 10030-1, Bern. 1927 Sup., defining the practice of dentistry, in so far as the same is pertinent to this inquiry, reads as follows :

“Any person…