Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Boglarsky
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 38Published
Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by William Flynn against George Boglarsky and others for libel. Judgment for plaintiff for nominal damages. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The alleged libelous article was:
“To the Honorable Judge of the Police Court:
“We, the undersigned,' do hereby request that Mr. and Mrs. Wm. Flynn, now residing at 241 Russell street, upstairs, be requested to move from said premises, and vacate entirely the immediate neighborhood of 241 Russell street, insomuch as making their residence there. The grounds for our petition is due to the obnoxious manner the said parties conduct themselves in the forced relations with their immediate neighbors, as disturbers of the peace, quarrelsome, and a general nuisance to the peaceful citizens about them.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flynn v. BoglarskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Kovacs v. MayorasMichigan Supreme Court · 1913