Legal Opinion

Clemente v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 16, 2015No. Civil Action No. 08-1252 (BJR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR AN INTERIM AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, United States District Court Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Angela Clemente, filed this suit under the Freedom of Information Act *12(“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, against the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), a component of the U.S. Department of Justice, and other unnamed agencies (collectively “Defendants”). Before the Court is Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for an Interim Award of Attorney Fees and Costs. Dkt. No. 126. Defendants oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 129. For the reasons…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clemente v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Allen v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  3. Powell v. United States Dept. of JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clemente v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Avanguard Surgery Center, LLC v. Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
  3. Michigan Immigrant Rights Center v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Schwieger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API