Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cestaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 15, 1991, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Given the activities claimant engaged in for her husband’s business, which included a substantial amount of checkwriting, the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that she was not totally unemployed is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Gonyo [Roberts], 124 AD2d 884). Consequently, the unemployment insurance benefits she received were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re the Claim of O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. In re the Claim of WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. In re the Claim of GonyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API