Legal Opinion

Rothrock v. McCollister

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

A pedestrian crossing a highway was injured by an automobile and brought this action against the defendant motorist. From a judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

The assignments of error challenge the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury upon the plaintiff’s theory of “last clear chance.”

The question for decision is whether the court must instruct upon an issue, and a legal theory, for which there is some support in the evidence, but for which there is no foundation in the pleadings. For the purposes of this appeal we assume, without deciding, that evidence can be found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stewart v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Niday v. TomasiniOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. VanceOregon Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API