Private Capital Group, LLC v. Hosseinipour
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*555“ ‘[Ujnder res judicata, or claim preclusion, a valid final judgment bars future actions between the same parties on the same cause of action’ ” (Maurischat v County of Nassau, 81 AD3d 793, 793 [2011], quoting Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross, 11 NY3d 8, 12 [2008]). Here, neither the plaintiff nor its predecessors in interest were parties to the prior foreclosure action, in which the defendants Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (hereinafter Wells Fargo Home), and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (hereinafter Wells Fargo Bank) (hereinafter together the Wells Fargo defendants), were parties.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell & RossNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of New York v. Welsbach Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nutt v. . CumingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re New Creek BluebeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barker v. AmoriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Targee Street Internal Medicine Group, P.C. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Marcum, LLP v. SilvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Edson v. Southold Town Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Edson v. Southold Town Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.