Legal Opinion

Child v. Western Lumber Exchange

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. 18803. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Child, seeks in this action recovery of damages which he alleges he suffered as the result of a wrongful garnishment proceeding commenced by the defendant, lumber exchange, against F. W. Waterman as garnishee defendant, in which proceeding Child intervened, claiming that the attempted garnisheed debt of Waterman to the original defendant judgment debtor, Sanger Lumber Company, had been assigned by it to Child, and that he, Waterman, was therefore owing it to Child and not to Sanger Lumber Company. A trial of this action upon the merits in the superior court for Spokane county,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abbott v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McIntosh v. KnoxNevada Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petrich v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Manhattan Quality Clothes, Inc. v. CableWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Block v. Olympic Health Spa, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API