Legal Opinion

Adams v. Norton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Nozvata County; T. L. Brozvn, Judge. Action by Louisa Adams against W. L. Norton, J. IT. Elkins, Isaac Cohn, W. V. French, J. B. Hoge, and Henson Oil Company. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

Plaintiff in error, in her petition in error, assigns errors committed by the trial court in the following particulars: (1) Error in rendering judgment in favor of defendants French, Hoge, and Henson Oil Company, and against plaintiff for costs; (2) error in not rendering judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants; (3) error in finding, as a matter of law, that plaintiff was not entitled to recover against said last-named defendants; (4) that the judgment is contrary to law; (S) that the judgment is contrary to the evidence; (6) that the judgment is contrary to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Whiteacre v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Meyer v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Kimbriel v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re McGannon's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Nichols v. DexterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Beugler v. PolkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. In Re McGannon's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API