Legal Opinion
Floyd v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 19, 2009No. 56, September Term 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
Owners of property in the Charles Village area of Baltimore City are subject to a Supplemental Tax in addition to the property tax that the City imposes on all property owners, although it is not imposed on property that is otherwise exempt under Section 6-8(a)(2) of Article XIV of the Baltimore City Code or by any act of the General Assembly, such as property used for charitable, educational or religious purposes. Sections 7-202 and 7-204 of the Tax-Property Article, Maryland Code (1985, 2001 Repl.Vol., 2005 Supp.).
In the present case, Joan Floyd and other individuals 1 subject to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Housing Authority v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- McCrory Corp. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Tyma v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Waters Landing Ltd. Partnership v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Tackney v. United States Naval Academy Alumni Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- (2009), Maryland Attorney General Reports2009
- Aleti v. Metropolitan Baltimore, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 99OAG225, Maryland Attorney General Reports2014