Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dopkowski v. Murray

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1952No. O-281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner filed his verified motion seeking an alternative writ of mandate against respondent to compel him to perform certain acts relating to matters allegedly pending in the Lake County Criminal Court.

Rule 2-35 of this court, 1949 Revision, provides that petitions for writs of mandate shall be verified and filed in triplicate and if the relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, as does the petition herein, certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter must be set out in the petition, or submitted as exhibits thereto.

The petitioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quigley v. Ackerman, Admr., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. AMERICAN FLETCHER ETC. v. Lake S. Ct.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Woods, Treas. v. KNOX CC, SEAL, J.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State ex rel. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co. v. Lake Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API