Legal Opinion

Protests 997435-G of Oxenberg Bros.

United States Customs Court

Decided October 8, 1940No. 44476Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The appraiser reported that the fish was not capable of being marked and that the immediate containers thereof bore no marks to indicate its country of origin. It appeared that each fish was wrapped in burlap and that a board bearing the words “Roumanian Product” was placed against its head. On the authority of Abstract 37822 it was held that the fish was marked in as permanent a manner as its nature would permit. Greene v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 97, C. D. 296) and Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) cited. United States v. Monteverde (26 id. 112,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Golding Bros. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. H. L. Greene & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API