Legal Opinion

Herkey v. Agar Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The demurrer in this case raises the question whether an employee may bring an action to recover damages for injuries or is completely barred by the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Laws of 1913, chap. 816, re-enacted and amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 41). This action is brought to "recover damages for *458personal injury received by the plaintiff in December of 1914 while working for the defendant in its factory. Liability is claimed under the common law. The answer "has pleaded as a separate and complete defense that the defendant has complied with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patton v. City of GraftonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Vanderbilt v. HegemanNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hanfgarn v. MarkNew York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API