Legal Opinion

Illinois Cent. R. v. Mann

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1925No. 24657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Etha Mann, by next friend, brought suit against the appellant for a personal injury inflicted by the appellant at Belmont, in Tishomingo county. The declaration *826was in three counts. The first count charged that the train which injured the plaintiff was being operated at an unlawful and excessive and dangerous rate of speed, and that this caused the injury. The 'second count charged that the servants of the railroad company in charge of the train saw the plaintiff in a perilous position on the track, or that by the exercise of ordinary care they should or could have seen him, and that,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Jamison v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Yazoo & M. V. R. v. HuffMississippi Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. Columbus & G. Ry. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. v. DailyMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Trico Coffee Co. v. ClemensMississippi Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API