Legal Opinion

Chapman v. . Comstock

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made December 6, 1890, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict and reversed an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granted a new trial. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of. $8,973.37, being the amount due and owing the plaintiff by the American Dairy Salt Company (Limited), a business corporation organized under chapter 611, of the Laws of 1875. It was sought to maintain the action against the defendant upon tlie ground that he was the president and director of the corporation, and that the corporation had failed to file the annual report required by the statute during the years 1881 to 1888, inclusive.

On and prior to February 11, 1882, the plaintiff held a promissory note for $10,880.90 of the Onondaga Coarse Salt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. In Re the Application for the Probate of the Last Will of RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Judson v. . Central Vermont R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Bank of China, Japan & the Straits, Ltd. v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Brigham v. McCabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Midland Insurance Co. v. FriedgoodDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Henavie v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API