Legal Opinion

Noble v. Higgins

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action by George Noble against William Higgins and another. Verdict for plaintiff, and defendants move to set same aside and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Judgment ordered as prayed by defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

On December 10, 1915, the plaintiff entered the restaurant of the defendants in the city of Oneonta, and asked to be served with certain food, offering at the same time to pay therefor. His request was refused, and he was ordered to leave the premises. The plaintiff commenced an action to recover from the defendants a penalty pursuant to the provisions of chapter 6 of the Consolidated Laws, known as the Civil Rights Law, as amended by chapter 265 of the Laws of 1913.

The evidence was brief, simple, and practically undisputed. At the dose of the evidence both sides moved for the direction of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woollcott v. . ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Grannan v. . Westchester Racing Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Brandt v. MinkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Charles E. Williams v. Howard Johnson's Restaurant, Russell v. Keys and Mary BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  2. Gober v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. John R. Thompson Co., Inc. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Drew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API