Ex parte Henshaw
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Dissent
Thornton, J.,
dissenting.—Application for writ of habeas corpus.
The only inquiry to be made herein is, whether the court had jurisdiction to imprison the petitioner for a contempt in the case before us.
The petitioner is held to be in contempt for refusing to obey a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda, rendered and given in the case of People ex rel. Daniels against the petitioner.
Unless the judgment is void, the court had jurisdiction, and the imprisonment for contempt is valid.
The inquiry there relates to the judgment rendered.
This judgment was rendered in a case in which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.