Legal Opinion

Dykes v. Hosemann

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 18, 1985No. 83-3347PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Per curiam

We have taken this case en banc to examine the scope of judicial immunity in a suit for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982).1 A panel of this court in Dykes v. Hosemann, 743 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir.1984), held that, where a judge performs a judicial act affecting the rights of a party over whom he knows the court has no personal jurisdiction, the judge may be liable to such party for money damages. We find this result both contrary to precedent and policy and reassert the common law doctrine that a judge enjoys absolute immunity where he or she had subject matter jurisdiction over the matter…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Rehberg v. PaulkSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Karun N. Jackson v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Robert David Figueroa v. Audrey P. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API