Legal Opinion

RATCLIFFE v. BRP US INC

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 27, 2025No. 1:20-cv-00234Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE STEPHEN J. RATCLIFFE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-00234-JAW ) BRP U.S. INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL After an eight-day jury trial ending in a defense verdict in a products liability case, a plaintiff brings a motion for new trial against the defendant-manufacturer. The court denies the plaintiff’s motion, concluding that it did not err in its pretrial evidentiary rulings, the jury verdict was not inconsistent, and the evidence submitted to the jury was sufficient to support the jury verdict. I.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Jose L. Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. National Metal Finishing Company, Inc. v. Barclaysamerican/commercial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API