Legal Opinion

Thrasher v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivAN, J.

The defendant was indicted for that, on, &c., he did unlawfully and knowingly suffer and permit his mare tc be then and there run in a certain race commonly called a horse-race in and along a certain public highway, &c., contrary to the form of the statute, &e. Plea, not guilty. The cause,, by consent of parties, was tried by the Court. Judgment against the defendant.

The proof was, that the animal run was a horse and not a mare. The only question is whether the variance was material.

The statute enacts, “that any person who shall knowingly suffer his horse, mare, or gelding, to be run in what…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bartender v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Conway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API