Legal Opinion

Colucci v. Insurance Department

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 10, 1997No. AC 16510Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The record reveals overwhelming evidence that the plaintiffs violated General Statutes §§ 38a-769, 38a-815 and 38a-816 (8), the violation of any one of which would entitle the insurance commissioner to revoke the licenses of the plaintiffs.

The most recent pronouncement concerning judicial review of the penalty imposed by the commissioner is that set forth in Goldberg v. Insurance Dept., 207 Conn. 77, 87, 540 A.2d 365 (1988). There, the court held that the penalty is at the discretion of the commissioner but “such discretion must be exercised within statutory guidelines.”

We conclude…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API