Legal Opinion

State v. Berg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 2008No. 05C42989; A129341PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for witness tampering, ORS 162.285(1), arguing that the evidence was insufficient to establish that an official proceeding was pending at the time defendant induced or attempted to induce the victim to withhold testimony, a material element of the crime. That argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in State v. Bailey, 219 Or App 526, 183 P3d 232 (2008).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008