Legal Opinion
Bruce Nadel v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 13, 2017No. A16A1670PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERCIER, Judge.
This Court granted Bruce Nadel’s and Brett Nadel’s application for discretionary review of the trial court’s order denying their motion to set aside an order confirming a non-judicial foreclosure sale. Because the evidence does not establish that Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”) provided the Nadéis with the required notice of the rescheduled confirmation hearing, we reverse.
Bruce and Brett Nadel are, respectively, the borrower and guarantor on a commercial loan that BB&T made in 2005. The loan was secured by a parcel of real estate, and the security deed authorized a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. KunesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Brown v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Ameribank, N.A. v. QuattlebaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Belans v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Capital Land USA, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Lajos SzencziCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- James Darin Dugger v. Hanping ZhuCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- The RIVER FARM, LLC v. HALL COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026