Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 23, 1979No. 77-1135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiff filed a class action on behalf of himself and all other police officers whose pensions were terminated by the defendant, Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Board), upon the conviction of a felony relating to, or arising out of or in connection with such service as a policeman.

The Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 108/2, par. 8 — 101 et seq.) provides retired policemen with pensions and other benefits. Section 5 — 227 of this Act states however:

“None of the benefits provided for in this Article…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kerner v. State Employees' Retirement System of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People Ex Rel. Naughton v. SwankIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Varnes v. DoughertyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Chestnut v. LodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Board of Trustees of Sanitary District Employees' & Trustees' Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Robinson v. Regional Board of School TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API