Legal Opinion
McGuire v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
delivered tlie opinion of the Court.
There is involved in this controversy the double indemnity provision of a life insurance policy for $241.70, which is as follows:
“Upon receipt of due proof that the Insured, after attaining age 15 and prior to attaining age 70, has sustained, after the date of this Policy, bodily injuries, solely through external, violent and accidental means, resulting, directly and independently of all other causes, in the death of the Insured within ninety days after the date of such bodily injuries while this Policy is in force, and while premiums are not in default…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mutual Life Insurance v. DistrettiTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ward v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Baker v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- McCrary v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Motley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Berne v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.