Legal Opinion · Dissent

General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1960No. 236-56Published

1DissentWhitaker, Judge

I am unable to agree with the majority. The retailer paid the purchase price not for a refrigerator alone, but for one that had already been advertised nationally and which the seller agreed to assist in advertising locally. Hence, when the seller remitted to the advertising medium or to the retailer his agreed contribution to the cost of local advertising, he was doing nothing more than fulfilling the obligation for which the purchase price was paid. He was paying for something he had agreed to deliver as part consideration for the purchase price.

A refrigerator on his floor was worth but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. F. W. Fitch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Campana Corporation v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Ayer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  4. F. W. Fitch Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1943
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API