Legal Opinion · Dissent

B.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. Somerset County

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 8, 2013No. 11-1833Published

1DissentNygaard, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the May 5, 2006 meeting between Eller and Judge Cascio violated procedural due process, and that the County is liable for this violation. I also agree that caseworkers Eller and Barth are immune from liability on this issue. I write separately because I disagree with the majority on the type of immunity that should be extended to Eller and Barth, and because I differ on the scope of the procedural due process remand.

As to the June 23, 2006 ex parte meeting, I conclude that Eller violated procedural due process, and I would not grant her any immunity on this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Gilles v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Odd v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API