Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1994No. 92CA2055PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

Plaintiff, Lyman Carroll, brought this action for declaratory judgment to determine whether his wife’s death was covered under an accidental death policy issued by CUNA Mutual Insurance Society. The court con-*76eluded that Mrs. Carroll’s death was not caused by an accident, and it therefore entered judgment in favor of CUNA. We affirm but under a different rationale.

It is undisputed that Mrs. Carroll died as a result of a rupture in a cerebral aneurysm. She suffered from hypertension, and at the time of the rupture, her blood pressure was further elevated as she engaged in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Senkier v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Julie M. Winchester v. Prudential Life Insurance Company of America, and Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Reed v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. Bobier v. Beneficial Standard Life Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API