Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to challenge as pretextual the prosecutor’s reason for peremptorily challenging an African-American prospective juror and thus failed to preserve his present contention for our review (see, People v Holman, 216 AD2d 488, lv denied 86 NY2d 796). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

Defendant further contends that prosecutorial misconduct during cross-examination of defendant denied him a fair trial. Defendant effectively waived his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. OverleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Domino Media, Inc. v. KranisNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People ex rel. Wilson v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API